Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on temporal trends of biological indicators of autoimmunity.

Background and objective: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with the onset of autoimmune conditions, but whether this relationship is causal remains unknown, partly because robust evidence based on the detection of autoantibodies is lacking. This study explored the potential impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the temporal trends of autoimmunity. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive autoimmune tests performed at one central laboratory at a University hospital, operating services for 18 other hospitals and clinical laboratories in Belgium, from January 01, 2015 to May 31, 2022. Longitudinal changes in the positivity rates of autoimmunity tests were analyzed, i.e. before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 11, 2020). The tests notably included the detection of autoantibodies associated with type 1 diabetes, thyroid diseases, connective tissue diseases, antiphospholipid syndrome, vasculitis and other organ-specific conditions. Kendall rank correlation test was applied to assess temporal trends. Results: Over a period of 89 months, a total of 301,720 consecutive tests for 24 different autoantibodies among 87,674 unique patients were performed (87% adults, 68% women, mean age 44 ± 20 years). Overall, 52,862 (18%) tests returned positive, with positivity rates for each test ranging between 1% and 46%. No increase in the positivity rate of autoimmunity tests was observed after the start of the pandemic. Conclusion: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with increased positivity rates of a large panel of autoimmune tests. Whether the higher incidence of autoimmune disorders associated with COVID-19 reflects detection bias or reverse causality, or is linked to seronegative autoimmune disorders requires further investigation.

Evaluation of a commercial interferon-γ release assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response after vaccination.

Objective: Evidence regarding the role of cellular immunity in protecting against COVID-19 is emerging. To better assess immune status, simple and robust assays measuring specific T-cell responses associated with humoral responses are needed. We aimed to evaluate the Quan-T-Cell SARS-CoV-2 test for measuring cellular immune responses in vaccinated healthy and immunosuppressed subjects. Methods: T-cell responses were assessed in healthy vaccinated and unvaccinated and unexposed healthcare workers to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 Quan-T-Cell IGRA test performed on vaccinated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Results: The EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 Quan-T-Cell IGRA test showed good sensitivity (87.2%) and specificity (92.3%) at the calculated 147 mIU/mL cutoff, with an 88.33% accuracy. In KTRs, specific cellular immunity was lower than the antibody response; however, those with a positive IGRA result produced as much IFN-γ as healthy individuals. Conclusions: The EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 Quan-T-Cell IGRA test showed good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of specific T-cell responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. These results present an additional tool for better management of COVID-19, especially in vulnerable populations.

Safety, Efficacy, and Relapse of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir in Kidney Transplant Recipients Infected With SARS-CoV-2.

Introduction: The efficacy of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR; Paxlovid, Pfizer, New York, NY) to decrease the risk of progression to severe COVID-19 in high-risk patients has been demonstrated. However, evidence in infected kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is lacking. Moreover, NR has significant and potentially harmful interactions with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we included all KTRs treated with NR from April 28 to June 3, 2022. A standard management strategy of CNI dose adaptation (discontinuation of tacrolimus 12 hours before the start of NR and administration of 20% of the cyclosporine dose) and laboratory follow-up was applied. Results: A total of 14 patients were included. Compared with day-0 (day before NR initiation), day-7 plasma creatinine concentrations and SARS-CoV-2 viral loads were similar (P = 0.866) and decreased (P = 0.002), respectively. CNI trough concentrations at the end of the treatment were satisfactory, nonetheless, with high individual variability. After a median follow-up time of 34 days, no death or viral pneumonia were observed. Nevertheless, 2 patients experienced early SARS-CoV-2 infection relapses (at day-10 and day-21) associated with an increase in SARS-CoV-2 viral loads. Conclusion: NR can be used in KTRs but requires a strict protocol of drug adaptation. We observed 2 cases of early relapse after NR treatment that need further investigations.

A comparative analysis of the outcomes of patients with influenza or COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital in Belgium.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has emerged as a global health problem, associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 or with seasonal influenza in a teaching hospital in Belgium. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, 1384 patients with COVID-19 and 226 patients with influenza were matched using a propensity score with a ratio of 3:1. Primary outcomes included admission to intensive care unit (ICU), intubation rates, hospital length of stay, readmissions within 30 days and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary bacterial superinfection, cardiovascular complications and ECMO. RESULTS: Based on the analysis of the matched sample, patients with influenza had an increased risk of readmission within 30 days (Risk Difference (RD): 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.11) and admission to intensive care unit (RD: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.15) compared with those with COVID-19. Patients with influenza had also more pulmonary bacterial superinfections (46.2% vs 7.4%) and more cardiovascular complications (32% vs 3.9%) than patients with COVID-19.However, a two-fold increased risk of mortality (RD: -0.10, 95% CI: 0.15 to -0.05) was observed in COVID-19 compared to influenza. ECMO was also more required among the COVID-19 patients who died than among influenza patients (5% vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is associated with a higher in-hospital mortality compared to influenza infection, despite a high rate of ICU admission in the influenza group. These findings highlighted that the severity of hospitalized patients with influenza should not be underestimated.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Delta and Omicron Variants of SARS-CoV-2: A Single-Center Case Series.

Rationale & Objective: Neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatments have shown promising preliminary results in kidney transplant recipients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, their efficacy in kidney transplant recipients infected with the Omicron variant has not been reported yet. Study Design: Single-center retrospective study. Setting & Participants: We included all consecutive kidney transplant recipients treated with monoclonal antibodies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections (positive polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swab) between June 10, 2021, and January 14, 2022. Forty-seven kidney transplant recipients were included. All patients had symptoms evolving for ≤7 days and no oxygen therapy need at monoclonal antibody infusion. Results: Symptoms at diagnosis were mainly cough (n = 25; 53%) and fever (n = 15; 32%). Eighty-three percent of the cohort (n = 39) had been vaccinated with at least 2 doses before infection, of whom 30 (77%) had demonstrated a vaccine-induced humoral response. They were treated with either casirivimab-imdevimab (n = 16; 34%) or sotrovimab (n = 31; 66%) a median of 2 days (range, 0-6 days) after the onset of symptoms. Except for 1 mild allergic reaction during casirivimab-imdevimab infusion, no side effects were reported. The median viral loads at admission (day 0) and 7 days after monoclonal antibody infusion were 2,110,027 copies/mL (range, 1,000-153,798,962 copies/mL) and 1,000 copies/mL (range, 0-10,000,000 copies/mL), respectively. Genotypes were available for 22 kidney transplant recipients (47%). Omicron, Delta, and Gamma variants were identified in 13 (59%), 8 (36%), and 1 (5%) patients, respectively. In kidney transplant recipients infected with the Omicron variant, the median viral loads at day 0 and day 7 were 752,789 copies/mL (range, 4,000-12,859,300 copies/mL) and 1,353 copies/mL (range, 0-1,211,163 copies/mL), respectively. 2 kidney transplant recipients required hospitalization immediately after sotrovimab perfusion for oxygen therapy that was weaned in 3 days, allowing patients' discharge. None were admitted to the intensive care unit or died. Limitations: Small sample size, no control group. Conclusions: Neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapy is associated with positive outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with mild coronavirus disease 2019, including those infected with the Omicron variant.

Development of SARS-CoV2 humoral response including neutralizing antibodies is not sufficient to protect patients against fatal infection.

More than a year after the start of the pandemic, COVID-19 remains a global health emergency. Although the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively studied, some points remain controversial. One is the role of antibodies in viral clearance and modulation of disease severity. While passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies protects against SARS-CoV-2 infection in animal models, titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies have been reported to be higher in patients suffering from more severe forms of the disease. A second key question for pandemic management and vaccine design is the persistence of the humoral response. Here, we characterized the antibody response in 187 COVID-19 patients, ranging from asymptomatic individuals to patients who died from COVID-19, and including patients who recovered. We developed in-house ELISAs to measure titers of IgG, IgM and IgA directed against the RBD or N regions in patient serum or plasma, and a spike-pseudotyped neutralization assay to analyse seroneutralization. Higher titers of virus-specific antibodies were detected in patients with severe COVID-19, including deceased patients, compared to asymptomatic patients. This demonstrates that fatal infection is not associated with defective humoral response. Finally, most of recovered patients still had anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG more than 3 months after infection.

Dynamics of spreading of SARS-CoV-2 in a Belgian hemodialysis facility: The importance of the analysis of viral strains.

In-center maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients are at high risk of acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by cross-contamination inside the unit. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission during the very first pandemic phase (March-July 2020) in a cohort of in-center maintenance HD patients and in nurses the same HD facility, using a phylogenetic approach. All SARS-CoV-2 quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction positive patients and nurses from our HD unit-respectively 10 out of 98, and 8 out of 58- and two other positive patients dialyzed in our self-care unit were included. Whole-genome viral sequencing and phylogenetic analysis supported the cluster investigation. Five positive patients were usually dialyzed in the same room and same shift before their COVID-19 diagnosis was made. Viral sequencing performed on 4/5 patients' swabs showed no phylogenetic link between their viruses. The fifth patient (whose virus could not be sequenced) was dialyzed at the end of the dialysis room and was treated by a different nurse than the one in charge of the other patients. Three nurses shared the same virus detected in both self-care patients (one of them had been transferred to our in-center facility). The epidemiologically strongly suspected intra-unit cluster could be ruled out by viral genome sequencing. The infection control policy did not allow inter-patient contamination within the HD facility, in contrast to evidence of moderate dissemination within the nursing staff and in the satellite unit. Epidemiologic data without phylogenetic confirmation might mislead the interpretation of the dynamics of viral spreading within congregate settings.